Web这是参考brpc的方案解决的,但是在后续编译时仍然遇到了下面这个报错,在试过修改系统的方式(上面提到的)后可以通过编译,我认为可能不是代码的问题。ps. libgo在修改-D__const__=__unused__后已经通过make && make install,我不清楚这由于是不是libgo的引起的 具体报错如下 WebI statically link most libraries, but I haven't been statically linking glibc. 我静态链接大多数库,但我没有静态链接 glibc。 A number of web sources recommend against that. 许多网络资源建议不要这样做。 Is there some way I can tell my newer compiler (gcc 7.3) to not require the newer glibc?
Static and Dynamic Websites - Digital UIC - Subject and Course …
WebOct 15, 2024 · Static linking doesn't fall under this exception. I'm not a lawyer but I think Rust would have to be licensed as (L)GPL to fit it. Another thing is glibc doesn't really support static linking, sure it works well for … WebJun 28, 2015 · While I realize that fully static linking is becoming harder, it is in general not impossible. But if I want to use MKL then it seems it is :- (. I have looked at the content of the static mkl libs with nm, and all functions for all hardware are there (libmkl_core.a is >400MB). What is the need for dlopen in this case? Thanks, --Laci 0 Kudos how to take off a stripped bolt
Make binaries portable across linux distros – TheCharlatan ...
WebThe size totals for glibc include the size of iconv modules, roughly 5M, in the “Complete .so set” figure. These are essential to providing certain functionality, and should be installed whether static or dynamic linking is being used. ... In the latter case, the program would simply fail at (static or dynamic) link time with missing symbols. WebThe most important reason why glibc should not be statically linked, is that it makes extensive internal use of dlopen, to load NSS (Name Service Switch) modules and iconv conversions. The modules themselves refer to C library functions. If the main program is dynamically linked with the C library, that's no problem. WebI like using the newer compiler. I would prefer to not compile with an older Linux base image (but I will if necessary). I statically link most libraries, but I haven't been statically linking glibc. A number of web sources recommend against that. Is there some way I can tell my newer compiler (gcc 7.3) to not require the newer glibc? ldd -v ... ready to run sale